All posts by Jonathan Tan

iCreate Mobility Challenge 2014

Somewhere along the way in July (after the second milestone), Jon decided to submit our project for the iCreate Mobility Challenge 2014, which was an NUS based mobile application development competition organised by the Computer Centre and sponsored by Microsoft BizSpark, M1, and People’s Association, just to name a few. I didn’t think that we were qualified to begin with, and I honestly didn’t think much of our project, which was essentially just a polling service. We later found out that there was already an existing company built on the idea.

Having neither a business plan for it (c’mon honestly, it was a summer project done to clear credits) nor was our web application a ‘real’ mobile application, I honestly wasn’t expecting this:

iCreate 2014 Award Presentation Ceremony

I would not try to justify or claim that these are the reasons why we won 3rd place, but going through with this taught me a couple of things:

You will never know until you try

Self-judgment does not give your product value. Other people’s judgment and perception of your product do.

A friend used to joke about this with a story: Let’s say some higher power wishes to reward you, you would probably want to make it easier for him to do so by buying a lottery ticket.

Only this time, it doesn’t just boil down to pure luck. You have worked on a product, and even if you don’t think much about it, someone else probably does. And when they do…

Appearances are all that matter very important

Feedbaker needed some marketing, and I had to do a pitch on its use-cases and features. When it comes to selling something, appearances matter a lot. Things that look better always get more attention than things that don’t (what applies in dating applies everywhere). This however, does not mean that dressing junk up nicely means that it’s going to sell.

There are just too many things that we worked hard to build upon this factor: our User Interface, colour schemes, layouts, posters. I had to also work on myself.

When people want to support/buy an idea, they are not buying just the product, they are paying for the person behind the idea.
It’s an entire package. Really.

Once again, I’d like to thank the organisers for this opportunity and the many people who have supported our project.

Final Milestone Thoughts

As we arrive at the third and final milestone of the Orbital Programme, we’d like to take stock of our lessons learnt and changes since the second milestone. Also, to review the decisions brought up in the previous post.

‘My Polls’ page (app-polls.html)

We have made some changes to improve the layout and usability. We felt that the polls interface is critical to the user’s experience of the application.

Firstly, the status of each poll is now dynamic with regards to the actions that the user can perform on each poll.

While there are no bulk action functions, we feel that the current application does not need housekeeping for the questions that the user creates due to a clear timestamp present in the interface.

Next, we have also included a ‘Help’ button that serves to guide new users. We felt that the application may not be as straightforward and self-explanatory to the user (as much as we have already catered for the usability of the application). The button sizes for the actions have also been enhanced to allow for easier clicking and interaction on mobile devices as well as on the desktop.

Some work has also gone into the inclusion of a column known as the Description – which we primarily conceived as a ‘Tagging’ feature we hoped to put in place for better organisation of different polls together to sort and display. Instead, the description is provided as a plain text attribute for each poll. This serves as an indicator for the user to differentiate between identical polls, but meant for different situations.

Final cleaning up and fixes

Since we have decided to get rid of some redundancies, we had to rebuild the routes on the front end to serve the correct pages for the appropriate links that we have provisioned for. Pages such as app-dashboard.html and about.html have been removed entirely from the app, keeping our focus mainly on the poll interface and the core functionalities of our question-and-answer features.

The results page now contains the option for users to toggle between different data visualisation methods on Google charts (incomplete, not ready for UAT) as well as an export function, which we have created to help presenters take stock of their responses offline to do operations such as a sum, min-max, etc for insightful analysis.

We’ve also provided for a hyperlink to the poll answering page on the ‘Get Link’ page for convenience of the presenter to navigate there should it be necessary.

Features that could not meet the final version

As much as we hoped to provide for a more complete to serve presenters, we were unable to finish up features that we have listed on our README:

  • Open project out to anyone to use

We have stuck to NUS OpenID despite the feedback to open it up to the public to use. We were looking at the option to completely remove the need for a login, where a user can immediately use the application freely and however he/she likes. However, we ran into a dilemma on whether we should go on to cater for anonymity in the polls, with how we should provide the option to bypass the authentication that is necessary to ensure that we have human responses.

  • Choice of Data Visualisation (Pie, Bar, Column)

As of now, we have provisioned for 3 different visualisation methods such as the Bar, Pie, and Column charts – all insightful for the quantitative sum of responses that would make sense on these charts.

(However, the visualisation techniques are not finished and we are unable to complete the implementation in time for this final milestone.)

  • “Youtube Live Comments” concept of open-ended results (comments)

This didn’t make the final cut as well as much as we wanted to. Solving the problem of the answer schema deemed to be too big a task for either one of us to deal with on ourselves without meeting up, and since we are miles apart, it was difficult to implement this portion given our priorities over the course of this project.

Self-assessment and reflections

Looking back on the 3 month journey (well actually 2, considering June was a time-vacuum which we completely left Feedbaker alone in its MVP state), we’ve touched and familiarised ourselves with the technologies we have summed up in this post.

Throughout the course of orbital, we found ourselves dabbling beyond the requirements and needs of Feedbaker as well to further our learning on other technologies.

For Jonathan in Berkeley, he has been actively engaging himself in conferences such as the Google I/O event, ForwardJS conference, as well as participate in the AngelHack and Outside Hacks Hackathon events which I am sure has further honed his skills and knack as a developer and product spokesperson.

For myself who has remained in Singapore, juggling a side project and the internship has been a strong practice in maintaining priority of tasks. I have also went for an AWS conference to learn more about Amazon’s cloud services and how to leverage on AWS to build, test, and develop applications that I may find myself doing in future. Besides that, I have also taken the time to dabble with Ruby on Rails using this guide to prepare for the Red Dot Ruby Conference in June. Feedbaker was my very first web development project and a fresh new endeavour that has taught me much over the many posts we have documented in this blog. I’d like to wrap up based on the important skills/traits I felt was important in seeing the successful state of this project in its current form:


It isn’t about what we knew that was important, but how we go about finding what we needed to know. Most of the time, trial and error was an imperative in figuring out what works and what does not. There were things on StackOverflow that I could not understand at times, and very often find myself in a situation where the documentation was not enough. Knowing the appropriate terminology to the things we want to find out more about helped in getting to the pages and answers that we were looking for.

Building incrementally

Skills that I picked up from CS1010 are truly the basics that we could not have lived without. For every feature that we wanted to develop:

  1. Get the most basic function to work first
  2. Build on the content/data
  3. See if it still works
  4. Repeat from 1

Thanks to the tools such as JSHint, Grunt, and plugins on our text editors, this process was hastened and we got by on existing web scaffolds (Yeoman) to build Feedbaker up very quickly (3 weeks) based on this method.

Getting Feedback

Since we were building an application on getting feedback, we actually had to get feedback to know more about what we can do, what could be done better, and what we should not do. Maintaining a constant feedback loop was important in figuring out what was necessary and what was not. Things that got us to focus can be essentially broken down into 3 main tiers (see also the MoSCoW Method):

  1. MUST-haves: What is essential (CORE features)
  2. NICE-to-haves (Augmentations)
  3. NO-NEED-to-haves

Going through the milestones (although we did not follow it strictly in its entirety) helped us to look at how a software development cycle feels like, and how our roles as a pair of developers are crucial in making sure that we trim the excess from the product to ensure that we meet our deadlines and expectations.

All in all, we feel that the Orbital experience has helped tremendously in accelerating and facilitating our growth as students in SoC, and as computing students that ought to sharpen our programming competencies.

We hope that this project blog has helped those who have accompanied us in this journey and has provided insights into our methodology and thoughts.

Back to the Commits

It’s been two months since any code has been pushed for Feedbaker.

With my internship coming to an end, I have found more time to get back to working on the application. Jon has been helpful by being available through a local VoIP number he applied for for about SGD40-odd a year. I think it’s really useful considering how it charges 2-cents per minute of outgoing talktime with a really stable connection and audio quality.

Coming back to the application, we realised that there still remains much to be done, and that we had to iterate through the features and things we have initially reserved for. Also, I seemed to have forgotten quite a lot of what has been done, going through the commit logs was great for a refresher. And then there was this, a style guide for JavaScript I found especially enlightening and useful.

After having a few friends try it out, we have made some interesting observations about how we could improve our current user experience. We’ve figured that making Feedbaker NUS-centric for now is for the purposes of making the polls non-anonymous. Our focus in building this application, is to provide a solution for presenters (professors and teaching staff) to obtain live responses. We decided that we want to focus on optimizing the user story from the perspective of a lecturer, and everyone else who wishes to use it won’t matter as much.

As such, there were important decisions that had to be made as well.

  • The Dashboard had to go.

Indeed it had to go, there will never be enough data for us to meaningfully (semantically) create a dashboard page to give an overview on poll data. It just didn’t make sense to me.

  • We needed a revamp of the ‘My Polls’ page to truly encapsulate a single view/page interface.

Thinking more along the lines of the UX, we felt that with the Dashboard gone, we needed to beef up the My Polls page more, and to inform users more about what they were seeing at first glance.

  • Create a modal popup to guide the user on how to use the applicationminor feature – additional functionality on the page gives bonus for interactivity.
  • Allow for more intuitive navigation and usability of the page

Some modifications were made to the schema to allow the lecturers to ‘tag’ descriptors to their polls, giving more meaning to the poll questions created and also to differentiate between identical questions that are meant for different classes.

  • An export feature

The export function was by far the most value-added feature that we felt had to exist in our application due a point raised early in the first peer-evaluation regarding our point of differentiation. With an export function, lecturers can now leverage on the .csv formatted data extracted from the system to log user activity that is non-anonymous – perfect for later implementing pivot tables on excel for decision making on all kinds of use cases. The possibilities seemed to coincide with our intentions.

We’re glad that Feedbaker has been shortlisted out of 13 applicants for the iCreate 2014 competition organised by the school. While we aren’t exactly a mobile application, we certainly hope the effort put into creating a fully responsive web application can survive the cut.

Homepage User Interface

Having completed the implementations of the poll processes and actions to our satisfaction, it was time to do some layout for our front page to showcase our Minimum Viable Product (MVP). While browsing themes on and bootswatch, we’ve taken inspirations from two themes, namely one known as Qubico and the other is Delta. We’ve also decided to use Flatly as our base theme to begin our build. But before anything could start, we had to dig up early sketches in our design process to come up with our…

Home page layout

What went into our front page was rather simple and straightforward. We decided that it had to contain a few of the main things we had to talk about what Feedbaker does (which was rather difficult considering how simple the app was).

  • Introduction
  • Features
  • How to create a Poll
  • Story behind the app

Later on we added on more sections:

  • Technologies
  • Call to Action
  • Footer

From scratch

The first thing that needed work on was the top navigation bar on the homepage. We decided that we needed to produce a logo, and thus found flat-icons from to use as a placeholder for our app icon. Followed by navigation buttons which we initially named and catered for ‘Home’, ‘About’ and ‘Login’/’Logout’. And thus we began with a fixed header that remains as the user scrolls.

<header id="top" class="header navbar-fixed-top" ng-controller="NavbarCtrl">

The process was tedious but necessary, the development of the frontpage took us a total of 3 days because of deliberation over the design and numerous iterations over how the colours should look and over what icons should be used.  Essentially, it boiled down to a simple 5 step cycle:

  1. Paste in section class and div ids tags to reserve the space
  2. Input content and icons.
  3. Edit css for the class and div id tags to configure colors, text alignment, padding and margins.
  4. View inspector to edit in browser to verify the look (grunt was takes quite a while to compile changes for the .scss files)
  5. Rinse repeat steps 3 – 4 until section is done.

Note: Our css file is written in the .scss format as it caters for a more ‘modular’ way at grouping css together. Our grunt scripts are configured to handle and compile the scss file into full fledged css file later on for the page will load from.

Icons, Graphics, Pictures

To make things slightly more interesting, we procured .png icons from various sources on the web and used photoshop to tweak the image sizes. Where image icons were heavy and unnecessary, we used glyphicons that came together in the bootstrap package for our graphical representation/aids in the front display as well. Initially we were trying out Font-Awesome, but it was broken in production and despite some attempts at fixing, it didn’t seem to compile due to the minification that was caused by the grunt build. Also, it didn’t seem to make a lot of sense to use Font-Awesome just for merely 4 icons.

Responsive Web Design and Media Queries

Jon shared an interesting book that really took the explanation and principles of responsive web design to another level with Ethan Marcotte’s Responsive Web Design.

With a brief skim on the book contents, and Bootstrap’s helpful CSS documentation on it’s grid system, things were very easy to configure when all we needed to do was to figure out how wide we want the content to be in each section, and correspondingly use col-md-1 to col-md-12 to play around with the columns in the row container. This helped us save a lot of time manually configuring the padding and layout positioning on the .scss file itself.

There are also some responsive utilities which I found very useful in hiding some things that may not make sense to show in the mobile interface that we might want to put inside the web page for a desktop view. Responsive utilities such as .hidden-xs allows for viewing on tablets and above, but not necessarily on small phone screens.

Revamp and Touchup

As we alternated through the sections with a blue colour scheme, we eventually moved on to fix up other parts of the home page, such as the Call to Action, which we felt should exist at the bottom after scrolling through the introductory information on the page (just like all respectable html5/css3 skinned product page you see on the web today). What was interesting to note here was how we decided to improve the flow of the user navigation from front page to login page to being redirected into the poll dashboard by revamping our initial login page, which was an extension of the home page on another view. This time, we decided to let the navbar go, and use a box to contain the text and buttons for the login page. This was done by providing a route for the Get Started button (our call to action on the homepage) for it to bring us directly to the login page itself. In any case, it would still be a 2+2-click through event for any user to get to the polls. (2 on our client, 2 on the NUS OpenID side)

Further plans

With 2 more months to go, we may have more to do and may improve on our functionalities and features for this app, and the frontpage may be due for more changes. Until then, we decided to forgo the about page and use the frontpage to capture all information intended for the user to read with a scrollspy implementation (see bootstrap/javascript) to get to the various section on our one-page slider layout. For now, we can’t get any happier than we already are.

Implementing Real-Time Results

Since we were looking into making things go real time, I took the opportunity to read up more on network related topics and this post shall cover what it was that I read through and learnt.


Taking the opportunity to look into the existing internet protocols, I had to touch on TCP/IP with all the OSI mumbo jumbo. I skimmed through this resource from Yale on TCP IP, and found out cool things like how it’s basically first invented for military purposes.

Then also after getting a better understanding of that, I also wanted to find out more on why not UDP? (Transport layer)


Jon explained that there is this new thing in HTML5 known as websockets and how it has made internet awesome. There were several other ‘primitive’ and arcade ways we could have made our polling system “live” with techniques such as long-polling, which basically sets the page to refresh every few seconds (this sends requests to the server for the page to load the new results). Doing so may actually DDoS the server.

And since we were doing things the Angular way, we had to read up on Angular websockets.

Thankfully there are also libraries out there for us to implement. Discovered earlier on when we were discussing on how to implement the real-time/live results in our results page. Finally arriving at the point where we actually have to do it, we found ourselves back here.

We were kind of lucky that recently patched and upgraded their stuff to v1.0. This meant that there was more support for Express framework and more documentation was provided.

Just with the following lines of code, we were able to set up Sockets to work immediately with our Express server.

var app = require('express')();
var server = require('http').Server(app);
var io = require('')(server);


app.get('/', function (req, res) {
  res.sendfile(__dirname + '/index.html');

io.on('connection', function (socket) {
  socket.emit('news', { hello: 'world' });
  socket.on('my other event', function (data) {

However, getting to work with our model layer was not easy, and we had run into several problems. Jon took over on this part to configure and fix up the entire websocket implementation for in this commit.

I guess the important take away here is that we have to think in terms of a ‘chat room’, that each time a socket is open, it serves the data posted by a user on another client to all the other users who are listening in the room. Which is essentially represented in this following snipper of code:

module.exports = function(app, io) {
   io.sockets.on('connection', function (socket) {
     socket.on('subscribe', function(room) {
       var roomPath = room.split('/');
       switch(roomPath[0]) {
         case 'results':
           // TODO verify socket.request.user is authorized to view results for poll
     socket.on('unsubscribe', function(room) {

Pusher and real-time push

Also read about Pusher, which is a hosted API for quickly, easily and securely adding scalable realtime functionality to web and mobile apps.

Phew. That was heavy.

Meeting up since LiftOff

With what I thought was effectively a 50% complete prototype, I decided that I have to meet up with Jon on the weekend to catch up on the project and get some more things ironed out together.

To give more breadth to the things Jon covered in the previous post, I’ll touch on more detail to the best of my memory.

We started off by reviewing the code that has been committed over the week, and discovered some interesting things about what JSHint finds error-prone in the existing scripts, such as naming conventions, as well as blank parameters.

‘My Polls’ page

Our initial focus was to also complete and sign off on the app-polls.html page, which is the page where the user views all the polls listed under his/her user ID. We revamped the poll page to just display actionable icons, which provided a more simple user interface and experience, and got rid of the confirm() prompt when activating/deactivating the polls (turns out JSHint does not like them either).

‘Get Link’ page + Short Links

We then went on to look into the ‘Get Link’ page, whereby we have previously decided on providing a short link to anyone to access the poll questions and answer interface.

The poll id as stored in the database is MongoDB’s ObjectId, a 24-byte hexadecimal string. This would be extremely inconvenient for typing out, especially on small mobile devices.

Initially, the decision was to interface with Google’s url shorterner ( API to generate our short links for us. The other alternative was to use However, upon more deliberation, we realised that implementing our own custom short link would be more effective and would serve as a better learning point on how they work.

We also tried using ShortId and Hashids to come up with the short link, but eventually generated it randomly.

 Math.random().toString(36).substring(2, 8)

What this gives us is a 36 character range with digits 0-9 mixed into a set of lowercase alphabetical letters.

‘View Results’ page

It was the second last actionable item that we have left to resolve (the last being the ‘Delete Poll’ action, which didn’t require a view page)

From experience gained in creating a new poll and the capturing of answers in the database schema. There was a better understanding of how to create the API for the results view. We set them up following the general steps of creating the respective API sections on the client side as well as the server (Express) side.

Quickly, we managed to also hack up a view for displaying the answers, and decided to use Google Charts as data visualisation. Initially the thought was to implement our own data visualisation diagrams, but figured that it would be much easier and more practical to simply employ Google Charts. The challenge however is making this page responsive, and to cater for a larger view of the charts on the desktop. Also, we are looking at the possibility of allowing users to choose between Pie charts, Line charts, and Bar graphs to suit their fancies.

Delete Poll

With some hands on, I was looking into implementing the deletion of a poll from the database. Having secured the API and set up of the respective client and server end requirements for allowing a DELETE request to be posted, I found myself going through a very tedious testing process of manually using the Mongo shell to test for three scenarios that might occur:

  • Deleting a poll but not deleting the answers
  • Deleting a poll that does not belong to the user
  • Failure to deleting a poll and end up deleting its the answers

Fortunately, with appropriate chaining of the callbacks, we managed to sort through securing the API to prevent the above scenarios from occuring, which leaves me with finding out how to implement a Bootstrap Modal through Angular to act as a confirm prompt (better UX) so as to delete the poll from the system. Reflecting the change immediately after deletion is also something to consider.

Envisioning the End

Some time was lost in the process of not starting immediately on the poll answer and results page as we wanted to have a better picture of how we wanted the layout to look like. Turns out that after much (or very little) thought, we decided to just go straight to the bootstrap elements and forget bout any further fancy ideas until at least getting the views up.

In the process, I discovered a couple great nifty tools for dealing with design interfaces:

While it provides real-time code collaboration, I was more concerned with the live preview as I can copy over snippets of html or the angular scripts to see if they work on templates that we were abstracting from the documentations provided.

I liked Easel for what it was: straight up user interfaces that I could grab code from for use directly. But the use case here is unfortunately limited since we had to do things the Angular way, and too much of this CSS stuff was in the way. Furthermore, it was painful to be learning the interface and the dragging and dropping just for me to come up with a design I could be happy with. Maybe in future I would find better luck for this.

I took the time to also prepare for the first milestone by doing a log cleanup on our spreadsheet. May is coming to an end after all.

All in a ‘View’

It’s over a week in now, and although slightly better off than where I first started, I’m still rather lost.

Read lots and added more things into the reading/tutorial list to go through:

  • Stumbled on a question on Unobstrusive JavaScript vs JavaScript Application link on Reddit.
  • Unfamiliarity to Node.js led to: How do I get initiated? (I agree with the asker that the documentation on node.js is absolutely unfriendly for beginners)
  • Angular has a pretty steep learning curve, so I had to look for other guides.
  • If I find the time, perhaps try to draw similarities and parallels from Angular to Ember.js, which hopefully will aid the understanding of Angular better in terms of the client-end MVC.

Sat through a really long one today with Jon as he was revising the module of saving Polls to the MongoDB database. We covered everything from creating Services/Factories in Angular to figuring out the $resource feature in the API. The day was spent reading through documentation and loads of fact finding which I also intend to catch up on through the git commit logs of the code (time I’m trying to make – perhaps burn a bit of midnight oil over the weekends to get this done).

Perhaps let’s start with some of the interesting and useful content I’ve learnt about today (which may be obvious to adept developers out there).

Client side and Server side validation

I think the best way for me to explain this is to refer to the best answer itself:

Client-side validation just avoids the client from going “but I filled this all in and it didn’t tell me anything!”. It’s not actually mandatory… Server-side validation is also crucial due to the fact that client-side validation can be completely bypassed by turning off JavaScript. In a way, JS-driven validation is a convenience and an aesthetic/cosmetic improvement and should not be relied upon.

We decided to add a client-side validation to our poll creation because we felt that it would be better to use Bootstrap elements to handle the user experience of invalid inputs. However what was more important was still the fact that server-side validation is necessary as highlighted in the above quote. Without a proper way to inform the user that the invalid response is made, the user (a non-tech initiated person) may not know if the poll is created for real.

With this security and usability feature in mind, it led me to know more about a very important web application development concept of…

Securing the API

Part of securing the API involves the server-side validation as covered above. The purpose to this is because we want to prevent database manipulation by a user because of an insecure PUT request. For instance, in other applications such as one that keeps score, we do not want the user to be able to save invalid strings of information that may trigger unwanted changes to the database. This includes changing the user’s score to another score value found in the database (or simply edit it due to lax permissions).

In our case, it was important that we validate the Poll model API such that we disallow simple exploits to the database, returning us invalid strings of information when we retrieve the poll from the database.

One would also want to secure the API also because anybody who can view the page can also view each javascript file that is included in the HTML file on the page itself. That means the user would know exactly how it is implemented in some way on the front-end for the validation. This is also why Client-side validation is certainly not good enough.

Use of REST Clients to test the API

Chrome Webstore has a good app for this purpose. REST Clients are amazing because they handle all the different requests: GET, POST, PUT, and many of the other usual CRUD and non-CRUD types of HTTP requests to the server. Our poll creation module for instance started in the beginning as a PUT request that deals with the following lines of code:

"owner_id": req.user._id
$set: set
}, ... 

Using a REST Client allows us to check if the request was valid and successful with a Status code 200 response (which could also be observed from the Inspector in Chrome.), and also to see if we can manipulate the data in the PUT request. In an earlier version of the code we simply used the entire req.body to the PUT request, allowing users to do things they should not be able to, which brings me to the next learning point.

Principle of Least Privileges (from Wikipedia)

The principle means giving a user account only those privileges which are essential to that user’s work.The principle applies also to a personal computer user who usually does work in a normal user account, and opens a privileged, password protected account (that is, a superuser) only when the situation absolutely demands it.

This idea also carries forward to user creation in our servers and also to ensure that we create users that have privileges for the whole ‘you-have-only-one-job’ principle. For example, when creating a user with  privileges to a folder under public_html/www, that user should only be given to the rights of www (if he/she is the web designer) to create posts or do whatever he/she wants within the contraints of that folder.

Mission Control: Twitter Bootstrap

Professor Min-yen did a Mission Control today on Bootstrap which I sat through via Hangouts on Air whilst working on the project with Jon. Funnily enough, almost all the features that we’ve been playing around in our View layers are all bootstrap UI objects. Revisiting the basics was also refreshing as we see some Sublime Text action from the screen. Got to appreciate GruntJS a lot more after watching the painful save-and-refresh process that was broadcasted.

Wrapping up

Still tons to do with regards to the project. Shall find a day to meet up and bulldoze through development as far as possible. Glad there were a handful of takeaway points from today.

More Design Decisions

Over the weekend

Decided to take it easy. Jon went ahead to make some more minor changes on the dashboard page. And we decided we had to have some more wireframes for the page layouts. While he was hard at work thinking, I continued on a couple other things:

If the Liftoff workshop’s GAE crash course didn’t cover the idea of MVC cogently, this pretty much explained how MVC works at the AngularJS level, as Angular pretty much breathes that concept. Pretty awesome how I stumbled on this on Hacker News just in time on Saturday as well.

Read enough into the basics to cover what was necessary so I could clear the confusion with the terminologies that show up on my git client – Tower. That said, I prefer the command line now that i’ve managed to do two lines of nifty (and helpful) codes that improve the user experience:

$ git config --global core.editor “open –t –W”

$ git config --global --add color.ui true

The first one tells the git application which editor I want it to use, in my case it’s Sublime Text, and since I’m on a Mac, the second option gives me colour on the user interface on the terminal. Neat.

  • Explore existing implementations

As we needed more design ideas for the layout, considering how barebones everything seems to be on our development machines, I decided to go search around for existing polling applications that are out there online. Most of them are catered for surveys ( and the good ones require an account and a price plan ( Amongst them, I found Checkbox to be the most balanced, even though the use cases differ a lot from ours. Checkbox gave me more insight as to what we should include into our Information Architecture, as well as the additional features we might want to implement in future: such as to include a full fledged survey on top of our one question polling system.

Moreover, as I explored into some of the layout best practices, I also picked up on the Rule of Seven, that is one should have no more than 7 things on the global navigation bar (not that I think we are able to come up with 7 anyway).

  • More CSS and HTML, Wireframes

Read into CSS selectors and media queries as part of the Responsive Web Design package. Learnt about the box model and this amazing thing called box-sizing, as well as the float layout. Since the days of IS2102, I’ve been using to do use case diagrams and activity diagrams amongst others, but it can do so much more. Instead of drawing with pen and paper like we did initially for our brainstorming, I’ll be using objects from to facilitate our wireframes and design ideas. What I like most about it is the integration with Dropbox or Google Drive, which makes storing and retrieving the templates easy.


The Week Ahead

I’m certainly going to be busy with other commitments on a list of priorities, but the plan seems to be pretty well defined. Shall use the evenings to speak more with Jon on what’s going on.

We intend to purchase the domain to use on a DigitalOcean droplet (yeah we’re spending money) by this week when we can get more of the layout done up – mainly so we could test on a server that doesn’t deploy from our machines. is also something we’re looking at to get our graphic designs and logos and other neat sprites that we want to generate from – all for only 5 bucks.

Meanwhile, time to get on to more prototyping.

Getting up to speed


Upon looking through the high-level decisions that we have made, Jon and I essentially spent the first half of the day exploring what we had to do: on his part, he was still deciding on the framework and what we could do to optimise for the quickest possible delivery given our time constraints. On my end, I was more focused on getting up to speed.

I spent a large part of day one familiarising myself with the languages which I suppose would have the longest serving effects in development. Jon and I initially thought of developing on Ruby on Rails during Liftoff, only to find out that the learning curve was far too steep for the both of us to achieve the goal of 8th June. As such, we had to redirect our attention and focus onto more manageable technologies. As such I had to pick up JavaScript, Git, and the Web fundamentals at lightning speed.

Point of Entry

I figured I had to start somewhere. Since we decided to get the front-end user interface done up first (because I supposed learning HTML/CSS was going to be slightly easier along with JS), I began by learning JavaScript from scratch at Codecademy. Syntactically simple, it was a breeze up till the point where I realised Node.js isn’t just JavaScript, and neither is anything else that is essentially a JS framework. Thankfully I stumbled upon three things I found most valuable in getting myself initiated on web development:

It taught me everything I needed to understand and know about responsive web design and the best practices in creating page templates. Moreover the nice site UI as well as the readily available source gave me a bird’s eye view which I could cover easily in just under 2 hours.

I found Duckett’s book to be an incredibly beautiful resource on learning HTML and CSS, although resources are plentiful all across the web. I also used sites such as and MDN’s references to get me initiated into the foray.

This site is a godsend. After learning up the basics of JavaScript, this was exactly what I needed to get familiar with the Node.js technology, considering the large code base that we’re going to maintain with modularity. I’ve yet to cover all the articles that are listed/compiled with great posterity, but I’ll make an effort to digest the gist of what is important to get started quicker.


Spending half of the day on material I certainly couldn’t finish, Jon got me started on the scaffolding of Feedbaker’s architecture on Google Hangouts has aided our collaboration immensely and has also helped relieve a lot of the anxiety and frustration over not being able to communicate effectively through instant text messaging.

Although there wasn’t much of a syllabus, I was very quickly initiated to the inner workings of how Grunt.js and works. Two applications which I found immensely powerful and useful in maintaining and managing the code that was to be deployed. We explored a number of other things, which includes:

  • Express.js’s Architecture
  • The glory of AngularJS – partials, views, controller, and routing and the entire workings of the bower components that manages all the packages.
  • Bootstrap as a web UI front-end framework
  • git reset HEAD --hard: the only way for me to not mess things up
  • Touched a bit on cryptography: Salt and uni-directional MD5 hashing (reason for this is because we were going through the authentication process, which was resolved using Passport.js package on npm)

Also, while Jon did most of the code, I followed each line written very closely on hangouts (something that drove my MacBook Air’s CPU crazy as I displayed the screenshare on a larger external monitor). Makes me feel guilty about not having any git pushes so far.

Yeoman did save our lives by providing the skeleton that we were dying to figure out on the first day (which led to quite a bit of worry). Decided to drop because it wasn’t being friendly with the premature shutting down due to inactivity (seriously?)

Also, I came up with a brief information architecture to outline what we wanted to include in our view layer. More to come as we refine along the way.